As far as CUTTING a sea level canal across the isthmus with nuclear charges? Both the USA and USSR fired test shots ("atoms for peace", Project Plowshare in US). The areas so treated were BADLY contaminated, to the point where it would be decades before unprotected people could use or maintain a waterway so created. Most of central America and a good bit of northern South America and/or Mexico likely would be a radiological dead zone afterwards too. Plus, a small matter of different water levels between the Atlantic and Pacific sides would make for a VERY interesting (and radioactive) one way whitewater ride for quite some time after.
I took this seriously enough to click the link and go to the site, but after ten minutes with no mention of "UNIFORMED CCP soldiers ... in Mexico," I realized that this is some kind of hoax or joke. Other readers: don't bother. Don't fall for it. Total waste of time.
No, that's not true. I saw it myself and put the link here. Monkey Werx is a well known podcaster who was in the military watching the skies as his job. He still does it now that he's retired. You have to watch some of the video and he says it. I can look again and tell you what timestamp to go to, but I would not put anything here that was a hoax!
Understood, so I apologize for calling it a hoax. It'd just that one encounters so much rubbish online that when, after 10 minutes, the host had said nothing about
Chicom soldiers in Mexico, I interpreted it as just another bit of internet hysteria. And I don't say that as a defense, but as an explanation to you as to why it seemed to me a hoax. Nevertheless, if you say that you would not post a hoax, then I accept that and apologize for having given offence, which was not my intent. My intent was just to tell others that what I had seen--nothing--was a hoax or, to use a better word, internet hysteria which, as I'm sure you know, is everywhere. Competition for people's time and attention online is fierce, so I wanted to save other people the annoyance of wasting time. Anyway, my sincere apologies to you.
I appreciate your motive, but you didn't really investigate before making the claim. Thanks for the apology. I just hope people won't see my name and disregard anything I post now that they've seen what you said.
I took at screen shot, but can't upload it. It's at 13:19/39:15. You couldn't have watched any of it, because it's pretty close to the beginning. This is offensive. Be sure of what you're saying. before calling someone else a liar and a fraud.
As I said in my initial post, I watched the first ten minutes. So yes, I *did* watch that much of it. But it should not take 13 minutes to get to what I had every reason to expect to be addressed in the first few seconds of the video--Chicom troops in Mexico?! How could that not be addressed right off the bat? And after ten minutes, I had no more time to spend waiting for what seemed to be a non-story. I hope this is sufficient for you to understand what I did. I assume you have already seen my apology, so I won't repeat that here.
Sigh. I disagree. A video may cover several points and you can't expect to see it in the first 10 minutes as stated. If you can't watch until the statement shows up, fine, but then don't put a statement out telling everyone it's BS. I replied to your apology before seeing this. Next time I will give the timestamp to avoid all this.
Mike in the 50s, dad worked on JTF 7 in the Pacific so as a kid I followed all kinds of nuke schemes that popped up. One was a Central American sea level canal. Google that today and who do we find but Hong Kong Nicaragua Canal Development Investment Company (HKND) that was cooked up in 2013. Cost estimates ultimately convinced the CCP that it was far cheaper to subvert Panana and control the existing canal.
Michael, you probably already know this, but www.jstor.com is a great online compendium of out-of-print, limited-distribution, or academic publications, and I use it a lot for research. Some of them go back to the early 1800s.
I'm currently using it to research the Ottoman-ordered Land Registry of Palestine, 1853. It's very interesting. I think it will tell me conclusively who stole whose land from whom, and put the Jew-haters to shame. I also use it to research Hajj Amin al-Husseini, "Father of the (so-called) Palestinians. Love those old books.
The Hong Kong-based conglomerate that operates ports near the Panama Canal has agreed to sell shares of its units that operate the ports to a consortium including BlackRock Inc., after President Trump alleged Chinese interference with the operations of the critical shipping lane.
In a press release, CK Hutchison Holding said Tuesday that it would sell all shares in Hutchison Port Holdings and all shares in Hutchison Port Group Holdings, in a deal valued at $22.8 billion.
(4 March 2025) The BlackRock-TiL Consortium and CK Hutchison are pleased to announce that they have reached in principle agreements whereby the BlackRock-TiL Consortium will acquire:
HPH’s 90% interests in Panama Ports Company (the “PPC Transaction”), which owns and operates the ports of Balboa and Cristobal in Panama (the “Panama Terminals”); and
CK Hutchison’s 80% effective and controlling interest in subsidiary and associated companies (the “HPH Transaction”) owning, operating and developing a total of 43 ports comprising 199 berths in 23 countries, together with all HPH’s management resources, operations, terminal operating systems, IT and other systems, and other assets appertaining to control and operations of those ports (the “HPH Ports Sale Perimeter”). The HPH Ports Sale Perimeter does not include any interest in the HPH Trust, which operates ports in Hong Kong, Shenzhen and South China, or any other ports in China.
Those book pages seem to be equally applicable to CLOSING the existing canal via nuclear demolition charges.
Sedan shot, Project Plowshare- Caused the worst single fallout event in USA's North American nuclear testing program:
https://youtu.be/Fh-c-NpNplQ?si=vdWX_P5LINg5AO6x
As far as CUTTING a sea level canal across the isthmus with nuclear charges? Both the USA and USSR fired test shots ("atoms for peace", Project Plowshare in US). The areas so treated were BADLY contaminated, to the point where it would be decades before unprotected people could use or maintain a waterway so created. Most of central America and a good bit of northern South America and/or Mexico likely would be a radiological dead zone afterwards too. Plus, a small matter of different water levels between the Atlantic and Pacific sides would make for a VERY interesting (and radioactive) one way whitewater ride for quite some time after.
I assert again, that You will find at time mark 13:19/39:15 that Laura Logan is asking on a tweet why CCP Uniformed soldiers are in Mexico. https://rumble.com/v6q974m-monkey-update-war-brewing-on-southern-border-sitrep-03.06.25.html
Talk about your Hot Gates...............
Dear Vladimir Putin,
Please do the world a favor and destroy these three targets with high power non-nuclear bombs:
1. 10 Downing Street and Parliament of UK
2. Vatican
3. United Nations Building NYC
Thank you,
Real Human Being
OMG. Michael and everyone - I'm watching Monkey Werx right now and he's reporting that there are UNIFORMED CCP soldiers in 2 platoons in Mexico right now with sniper rifles. https://beforeitsnews.com/prophecy/2025/03/new-monkey-werx-war-brewing-on-southern-border-sitrep-03-06-25-2568166.html
I took this seriously enough to click the link and go to the site, but after ten minutes with no mention of "UNIFORMED CCP soldiers ... in Mexico," I realized that this is some kind of hoax or joke. Other readers: don't bother. Don't fall for it. Total waste of time.
No, that's not true. I saw it myself and put the link here. Monkey Werx is a well known podcaster who was in the military watching the skies as his job. He still does it now that he's retired. You have to watch some of the video and he says it. I can look again and tell you what timestamp to go to, but I would not put anything here that was a hoax!
Understood, so I apologize for calling it a hoax. It'd just that one encounters so much rubbish online that when, after 10 minutes, the host had said nothing about
Chicom soldiers in Mexico, I interpreted it as just another bit of internet hysteria. And I don't say that as a defense, but as an explanation to you as to why it seemed to me a hoax. Nevertheless, if you say that you would not post a hoax, then I accept that and apologize for having given offence, which was not my intent. My intent was just to tell others that what I had seen--nothing--was a hoax or, to use a better word, internet hysteria which, as I'm sure you know, is everywhere. Competition for people's time and attention online is fierce, so I wanted to save other people the annoyance of wasting time. Anyway, my sincere apologies to you.
I appreciate your motive, but you didn't really investigate before making the claim. Thanks for the apology. I just hope people won't see my name and disregard anything I post now that they've seen what you said.
I took at screen shot, but can't upload it. It's at 13:19/39:15. You couldn't have watched any of it, because it's pretty close to the beginning. This is offensive. Be sure of what you're saying. before calling someone else a liar and a fraud.
As I said in my initial post, I watched the first ten minutes. So yes, I *did* watch that much of it. But it should not take 13 minutes to get to what I had every reason to expect to be addressed in the first few seconds of the video--Chicom troops in Mexico?! How could that not be addressed right off the bat? And after ten minutes, I had no more time to spend waiting for what seemed to be a non-story. I hope this is sufficient for you to understand what I did. I assume you have already seen my apology, so I won't repeat that here.
Sigh. I disagree. A video may cover several points and you can't expect to see it in the first 10 minutes as stated. If you can't watch until the statement shows up, fine, but then don't put a statement out telling everyone it's BS. I replied to your apology before seeing this. Next time I will give the timestamp to avoid all this.
https://st.llnl.gov/news/look-back/plowshare-program
Mike in the 50s, dad worked on JTF 7 in the Pacific so as a kid I followed all kinds of nuke schemes that popped up. One was a Central American sea level canal. Google that today and who do we find but Hong Kong Nicaragua Canal Development Investment Company (HKND) that was cooked up in 2013. Cost estimates ultimately convinced the CCP that it was far cheaper to subvert Panana and control the existing canal.
OMG! You are leaving me in the middle of a fab story?
Atomic blasts!? I’m surmising the jargon is tnt. No…the above replies concur. How can that be so? Limited?
My father-in-law was a geotechnic engineer for the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers. He worked on that project.
Michael, you probably already know this, but www.jstor.com is a great online compendium of out-of-print, limited-distribution, or academic publications, and I use it a lot for research. Some of them go back to the early 1800s.
I'm currently using it to research the Ottoman-ordered Land Registry of Palestine, 1853. It's very interesting. I think it will tell me conclusively who stole whose land from whom, and put the Jew-haters to shame. I also use it to research Hajj Amin al-Husseini, "Father of the (so-called) Palestinians. Love those old books.
Thanks for speaking so kindly about my father's homeland, Michael.
Your realy do a great job. I'd love to chip in for your helmet, but I'd better save my pennies and get my own first.
Did Blackrock just buy the Panama Canal?
Just the Chinese Chokepoints
In his video with Emerald Robinson he said as much.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/blackrock-panama-canal-deal-ck-hutchison-trump/
The Hong Kong-based conglomerate that operates ports near the Panama Canal has agreed to sell shares of its units that operate the ports to a consortium including BlackRock Inc., after President Trump alleged Chinese interference with the operations of the critical shipping lane.
In a press release, CK Hutchison Holding said Tuesday that it would sell all shares in Hutchison Port Holdings and all shares in Hutchison Port Group Holdings, in a deal valued at $22.8 billion.
Press release
https://www.ckh.com.hk/en/media/press_each.php?id=3431
JOINT – ANNOUNCEMENT
(4 March 2025) The BlackRock-TiL Consortium and CK Hutchison are pleased to announce that they have reached in principle agreements whereby the BlackRock-TiL Consortium will acquire:
HPH’s 90% interests in Panama Ports Company (the “PPC Transaction”), which owns and operates the ports of Balboa and Cristobal in Panama (the “Panama Terminals”); and
CK Hutchison’s 80% effective and controlling interest in subsidiary and associated companies (the “HPH Transaction”) owning, operating and developing a total of 43 ports comprising 199 berths in 23 countries, together with all HPH’s management resources, operations, terminal operating systems, IT and other systems, and other assets appertaining to control and operations of those ports (the “HPH Ports Sale Perimeter”). The HPH Ports Sale Perimeter does not include any interest in the HPH Trust, which operates ports in Hong Kong, Shenzhen and South China, or any other ports in China.
Russia tried it...
Michael, I read that they DID use the atomic bombs. For example:
“Presented herein for the first time are the analyses of Atlantic muck slopes subjected to underground explosions of atomic bombs.”
Sure sounds like analyses after the fact. Multiple explosions.
I love old books <3
Good find, and hardcopy is always the best. For those of us who like to see the details, I latched onto a free digital version
https://dloc.com/es/AA00029641/00001
Report of the Governor of the Panama Canal
under Public Law 280, 79th Congress, 1st session
1947 Annexes 3-4-5
Link within to book, others too
https://dloc.com/es/AA00029641/00001/images