226 Comments

I remember HRC was the Ping Pong queen. Podesta email says she enjoys a slice herself.

Expand full comment

It was a False Flag. There was NO BLOOD on Trumps shirt and very little on his hand, F is the 6th letter in the alphabet: fight, fight, fight = 666, Then the “Let me get my shoes!” Comment. Shoes = Masonic symbol in false flag. See Ole Dammegard on Bitchute who has been researching and analyzing false flags for decades,

Expand full comment

Actually, I should stop posting - this interview of Pavel Durov by Tucker Carlson here https://tuckercarlson.com/the-tucker-carlson-interview-pavel-durov?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email apparently says this: "Telegram founder Pavel Durov recently revealed to Tucker Carlson that the FBI approached a Telegram engineer, attempting to secretly hire him to install a backdoor that would allow U.S. intelligence agencies to spy on users.

The FBI also hired agents to infiltrate 'anti-vaxx' Telegram groups, with FBI contractors creating multiple fake online identities to join chatrooms run by groups opposing vaccine mandates." So it occurs to me - goodness - the FBI may have people on this substack or any substack waiting to figure out who they can arrest next....

Expand full comment

From everything I have been able to read, my own conclusion is that both the FBI and some in the Secret Service - not all probably, but some, probably at high levels - actively participated in the assassination attempt. Since the FBI has already destroyed evidence and is covering up, Congress has been hindered in their own investigations and neither FBI or Secret Service have been very forthcoming with info or transparent. Local law enforcement came to a meeting on the morning of the event which was to have been jointly with local + Secret Service for coordination of activities - Secret Service did not attend. Local law enforcement provided an adequate number of communication devices so that local + Secret Service could all have been on same channel; Secret Service did not pick up the devices. I have also read that this was the first time ever that counter-snipers had been deployed at a Trump event - why? Perhaps they expected something to happen, and wanted to be sure that the young man was killed as soon as he had shot Trump? There is also quite a history of the Trump team requesting security resources and getting less than requested, so that might suggest that all along someone in Secret Service was quite willing for this to occur. This also happened this time, that they requested security resources, got less than requested, and apparently most of it "last minute" the day before, hindering planning and coordination, though even the coordination that would have been possible was intentionally disregarded. It was like, they wanted this to happen - why else would they refuse to meet with local law enforcement and refuse to use the communication devices provided to be able to communicate with locals? Local law enforcement stated that they TOLD Social Security, that morning, that Secret Service needed to secure / protect the building that shooter ended up using - Secret Service did not; Secret Service claimed they had assigned that building to local law enforcement, but locals say they informed Secret Service they would be unable to be responsible for that building and Secret Service needed to take care of it. Secret Service seems to have done nothing about it, except to say the roof was too steep. As to the FBI, they sent teams to clean up evidence immediately after the shooting, like cleaning up biological evidence at the site where shooter was shot - I have read this is unprecedented for agents to be sent out to clean up like that. They also signed off on having the body cremated the day before a Congressional investigation would have examined the body - now that evidence is forever, intentionally, destroyed. Cremated. Although Secret Service and FBI were extremely quick to say that the shooter acted "alone," this 19 year old young man, who worked as a health aide at a nursing home, had an encrypted communications account where he was apparently communicating with people in Belgium, Germany & New Zealand. That's odd, wonder who was talking to. Shortly before shooting, some Iranian guy entered the US and I understood was "followed" but not detained, at same time Iran was making threats to get Trump. Besides this, it has been learned by using cell phone data that some phone was frequently in / near FBI HQ and also frequently in the vicinity of Crooks' home - maybe an agent who works for FBI but was paying visits to Crooks? He didn't learn how to make bombs and detonators on his own. So he may have been working with the FBI, which we can't know because FBI is not giving any info, and they have a history of lying repeatedly and hugely to the American people. They lie, and there is no reason to believe anything they say, but they are not saying. We have some very corrupt government agencies. So - if they are lying, when they so quickly said Crooks was working alone when it seems he was not working "alone" - why are they concealing all this? When Congress interviewed Cheatle, some of the Congressional reps, including AOC, said - the American people deserve answers NOW, not 6 months from now. Decisions have to be made during the election as to how to protect candidates. Yet FBI and Secret Service lie and say "working alone" when anyone could see that is not the case, but they are covering up their own involvement. At least a few people knew about this way in advance and were actively involved, in my opinion, and I think the evidence supports that. Several professional security people in evaluating the evidence say that the Secret Service was not that stupid, this had to have been planned. I agree, though I am not a security professional, but people who are experts in this field think so. Also, I have read that all the news agencies were rapidly given talking points and were urged to created the questions as to whether Trump even had been shot. All the agencies had the same talking points to minimize this. As to number of shooters, it is known that when the local law enforcement guy went up to the roof, and shooter pointed gun at him, local guy dropped down to avoid being shot - was not able to access his own weapon. But it is thought this may have rushed Crooks then to shoot quickly which may have contributed to his shots missing since there were several shots - he was shooting and obviously missed Trump each time, but may not have been aiming carefully each time. But - a local guy from a SWAT team ran toward Crooks while Crooks was actively shooting, and local guy took one very well aimed shot that destroyed Crooks' weapon so it could not have been used further, and when the gun was shot, it hit Crooks in the face. Within seconds, very quickly, one of the counter snipers fired the shot that killed Crooks. He would not have been able to do any additional shooting from that gun, but there was no time to have figured that out and counter sniper fired that shot that killed Crooks. This apparently accounts for all the bullets, or some say it does, and this does add up to three people and three weapons. The water tower aspect is still going to be further investigated but at this point, there is evidence indicating there was no shooter on the water tower due situation of tower height, ladders being too high to get to, etc. The explanations I have read seem to account for many aspects indicating - no water tower shooter, but still, some additional checking to be done. But one other important point is how many people saw Crooks coming and going, and how many saw him with the rifle in advance of shooting - yet he was not stopped, and Trump not prevented from speaking. I can't believe this was all coincidental but by intent, and of course Secret Service had declined to use the communication devices offered by locals. Local guys knew about the shooter, but Secret Service didn't? If they didn't, it was willfully planned that way.

Expand full comment

James Howard Kunstler interviewed globally renowned Belgian virologist and immunologist, Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, who, without actually mentioning its name, UNAMBIGUOUSLY DEFENDED OPERATION WARP SPEED.

J. H. Kunstler (host):

(10:01) “Were you alarmed by the speed that this vaccine was produced? Or, did you suspect or know that something was going on behind the scenes in the development of this vaccine?”

Dr. Vanden Bossche:

(10:16) “Well, we were of course all surprised but,…(10:21) it all comes down to the misjudgment, because...if you think you are dealing with a virus that has the potential to kill 2/3 of the world population within a very short period of time because it’s a pandemic...nobody…was saying anything because IT WAS AN ABSOLUTE EMERGENCY and THE RISK/BENEFIT ANALYSIS WAS VERY CLEARLY IN FAVOR OF ANY MEASURES THAT COULD BE IMPLEMENTED VERY RAPIDLY and to the GLOBAL population (11:10) and...THAT IS WHAT VACCINES CAN DO.

…AT THAT TIME, NOBODY WAS REALLY ASKING THE QUESTIONS THAT WE ARE HEARING RIGHT NOW...it’s very interesting that back in those days, 3 YEARS AGO, ALMOST NOBODY WAS RAISING QUESTIONS ABOUT THE SPEED OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THESE VACCINES, ABOUT THE LIMITED AMOUNT OF CLINICAL DATA, etc.

NOW OF COURSE IT’S EASY TO MAKE BIG NOISE and say, ‘Oh, yeah, this has not been done and there were contaminations.’...but, again, THE OVERALL CLIMATE and the overall landscape was the one where EVERYBODY BELIEVED ... WHAT THE W.H.O. AND SOME OTHERS WERE PREDICTING that this could have a huge impact and destroy...lots and lots of...lives...People believed it and then

IT WAS NOT A QUESTION WHAT IS THE RISK COMPARED TO THE BENEFIT

BECAUSE THE RISK WAS SIMPLY HUGE,

...And not very many questions asked about the safety and the purity of the vaccines and the limited amount of data, etc.”

Transcribed from

KunstlerCast 398

March 31, 2024

https://kunstler.com/podcast/kunstlercast-398-dr-geert-vanden-bossche-and-the-coming-acute-crisis-of-covid-among-the-vaccinated/

Expand full comment

I can not for the reaaons for a hoax, the timing of the hoax or any other minutia of details, the vax is the most deadly military operation in our living history - full stop. In the USA 3000 people a day are dying from it. In Canada 300 people a day, on and on. . What am I missing.

Expand full comment

Wilma, don't throw Michael out with the Bath Water. He's a patriot. That said, he probably wouldn't trust anyone he didn't know well. How well do we know anyone, anyway? It's not sacrilege to speculate or to think out loud. Most of us have wondered abt Trump from time to time. After all, we trust those most we can get to know most. He may regret having said this, but even if he doesn't, Michael Yon is a patriot and he's learned the hard way that we are living through a huge psyop. God Bless.

Expand full comment

Does anyone here remember Lavoy Finicum? He was the cowboy patriot who was ambushed and murdered by the FBI Hostage Rescue Team in Oregon just after President Obama signed the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act that gave the President the power to authorize the killing of anyone anywhere that he/she deems an enemy of the USA. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/3082372/days-after-biden-said-time-to-put-trump-in-a-bullseye-someone-tried-to-kill-trump/

Expand full comment

+1 (can't upvote substack comments)

Seems Obama pushed through a lot of stuff no other president could have gotten away with.

Expand full comment

Getting a bit queasy about the Trump shooting since I’ve seen the video of the man on top of the water tower synchronized with the video of the crowd reaction as the bullets hit the crowd and killed the retired fire chief. Reminds me of the Jack Reacher movie in 2012 with the sniper who killed several to conceal the true target. Could Trump have participated in his own assignation attempt and faked his injury with a blood pack? That’s what I thought the second I heard about it. And now, I don’t know.

Expand full comment

Who cares. This place is fake

Expand full comment

+1 for your username

Expand full comment

PSS I was on here way back when. Really liked you and followed your feed. Followed you again. We will not, at this time, agree on Trump. But I followed you again. Nice seeing you again!

Expand full comment

It’s time to stop calling this an assassination attempt. It’s like calling Bruce Jenner a woman. Delusional.

Expand full comment

Phenomenal Insights as always. Would be great for you to have time to educate a larger audience.

Expand full comment

I’d like to point out that even though everybody is assuming an attempt on Trump’s life, there is the possibility of this being a warning shot. They knew Trump will become the president. Maybe they fired a warning shot to force him to keep in line with their goals.

This is Trump’s VP Vance at the RNC saying: “A lot of people recognize that we need to do something with Iran. But not these weak little bombing runs.” “If you’re gonna punch the Iranians, you punch them hard,”

Is it difficult to assume that the wars will continue in one form or another?

Trump’s presidency will be defined by the people he surrounds himself with, by the people he picks for his cabinet.

Expand full comment

Thanks for posting this. I’ve been having these thoughts ever since the photo of the bullet came out.

Expand full comment

There doesn't seem to be much discussion about a second shooter.

Remember the ambassador stating he heard two distinctly different calibers during the shooting.

Expand full comment