“ Ipsam Sequens Non Devias” Our Lady of America pray for us. Our Lady of Guadalupe pray for us. Our Lady of Good Success pray for Michael Yon and his team.
Prayer based in Truth..As the Virgin of Guadalupe is the 'Patron Saint for all the Americas, especially, the nations of Latin origin.
When The Bible speaks of 'God's', it refers to polytheistic paganism or Demon Worship, if not Luciferianism based upon self-worship as one's own God... Having practices mirroring one another even though isolated form one another in variety of cultures around the world.
Michael and Masako do such wonderful job bringing insights into these far-away places...
Sounds like Hegseth & Mulino are on the same page as Michael Yon - a US/Panama alliance aimed at diminishing Chinese influence in the "Canal Zone". You should be pleased, as I believe you have influenced events there.
But time, I think, to stop creating new barriers to your supporting the Trump Administration's efforts by insisting that they stop funding the United Nations. To be sure, UN funding is problematic. But it is unrealistic - right now, anyway - to expect the US to abandon the UN. And the UN, while annoying, is not the root problem. China is, and you have expressly recognized it.
The question isn't whether the UN is a useful institution - or even whether it's one that stands as an ineffective bastion for human rights. It's nothing useful or valuable at all.
The question is what it becomes if the US withdraws? NATO might collapse without US support, but the UN includes Arab states, the African and South American continents and Asian countries (including the BRICS countries). Not quite so likely to collapse. And if it does not, what does its agenda become? Who will drive it? Who will fund it?
A primary target of the UN will be Israel; many Americans are fine with that, but I'm not so sure it's a good thing. One could argue Israel is valuable both as an outpost against Islamic hegemony, and as occupying a critical strategic location with respect to trade routes. Of course, the Security Council will still have two friendly members: UK and France. Well, wait a minute . . . how friendly are they, exactly (both have basically socialist governments at present)? They will not take kindly to becoming new putative "sugar daddies" for the organization.
The UN is not a good thing; in fact, you could be excused for thinking it's a modern evil. But are we actually better on the outside, or the inside?
Very fair points. Much to consider. Also, if we withdraw, then what influence would the CCP have on the remaining countries (and would it matter?). I don't have an answer at this point.
“ Ipsam Sequens Non Devias” Our Lady of America pray for us. Our Lady of Guadalupe pray for us. Our Lady of Good Success pray for Michael Yon and his team.
Prayer based in Truth..As the Virgin of Guadalupe is the 'Patron Saint for all the Americas, especially, the nations of Latin origin.
When The Bible speaks of 'God's', it refers to polytheistic paganism or Demon Worship, if not Luciferianism based upon self-worship as one's own God... Having practices mirroring one another even though isolated form one another in variety of cultures around the world.
Michael and Masako do such wonderful job bringing insights into these far-away places...
🌹🙏🏼🌹
Fascinating post, Michael. Two minutes well invested. I thought I was listening to old pirate tales of lost Cortez gold...
Brother you are in the right path as Lara. My humble opinion only
Dangerous UN enables
Sounds like Hegseth & Mulino are on the same page as Michael Yon - a US/Panama alliance aimed at diminishing Chinese influence in the "Canal Zone". You should be pleased, as I believe you have influenced events there.
But time, I think, to stop creating new barriers to your supporting the Trump Administration's efforts by insisting that they stop funding the United Nations. To be sure, UN funding is problematic. But it is unrealistic - right now, anyway - to expect the US to abandon the UN. And the UN, while annoying, is not the root problem. China is, and you have expressly recognized it.
Thanks for all you do.
The question isn't whether the UN is a useful institution - or even whether it's one that stands as an ineffective bastion for human rights. It's nothing useful or valuable at all.
The question is what it becomes if the US withdraws? NATO might collapse without US support, but the UN includes Arab states, the African and South American continents and Asian countries (including the BRICS countries). Not quite so likely to collapse. And if it does not, what does its agenda become? Who will drive it? Who will fund it?
A primary target of the UN will be Israel; many Americans are fine with that, but I'm not so sure it's a good thing. One could argue Israel is valuable both as an outpost against Islamic hegemony, and as occupying a critical strategic location with respect to trade routes. Of course, the Security Council will still have two friendly members: UK and France. Well, wait a minute . . . how friendly are they, exactly (both have basically socialist governments at present)? They will not take kindly to becoming new putative "sugar daddies" for the organization.
The UN is not a good thing; in fact, you could be excused for thinking it's a modern evil. But are we actually better on the outside, or the inside?
Very fair points. Much to consider. Also, if we withdraw, then what influence would the CCP have on the remaining countries (and would it matter?). I don't have an answer at this point.
THANK YOU
Traumatized Darien, Thank you...eloquent two minutes.